#FADAR Psalms 5:1-12 Nobody loves everyone, not even God loves everyone.

 GRUPOS ARMADOS DE VENEZOLANOS EXTORSIONAN A PERUANOS, ELLOS SÍ USAN LA PENA DE MUERTE EL GOBIERNO NO

 Jesús es tentado en el desierto por Satanás - El cuento de los romanos es destruido por la razón.

 Luz Victoria, la mujer de mi inspiración

I do what they would do (Revelation 12:7), I fight against the false testimonies against God, and the Bible includes those false testimonies, that's why Revelation 12:9 says what it says: the Bible is part of that world deception. With these words: Revelation 22:18 I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: If anyone adds to these things, God will bring upon him the plagues that are written in this book. 19 And if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his part from the book of life, and from the holy city and from the things that are written in this book. John was not referring to the Bible, the Bible did not exist, John was referring to the true gospel that consisted of cursing enemies, not blessing them as the lie states in Matthew 5:38-48, precisely for this reason he curses to those whom he knew would adulterate the words even of the book of that book that he wrote, however no lie is solid, no saint died feeling love for their enemies who murdered them, this passage evidences it: Revelation 6:10 And They cried out loud, saying: How long, Lord, Holy and True, do you not judge and avenge our blood on those who dwell on earth? God is also vengeful, and that passage makes it clear: Revelation 16:5 And I heard the angel of the waters saying, You are just, O Lord, who art and was, the Holy One, because you have judged these things. . 6 Because they shed the blood of saints and prophets, you have also given them blood to drink; well they deserve it. 7 I also heard another, who from the altar said: Indeed, Lord God Almighty, your judgments are true and just. Love for enemies based on a God who loves his enemies is part of the Roman lies in the gospel.

The love of enemies is a deception of the enemy of God, the denial of the law that prohibits the consumption of foods such as pork and bats is also a deception; The Bible has lies from the empire that never converted to the faith that it persecuted, the Roman empire persecuted that faith to destroy it by Hellenizing it. In the version of the gospel falsified by the Romans in Matthew 15:11 Jesus tells us (To deny the law in Deuteronomy 14): "Eat everything because nothing that enters a man's mouth contaminates him", the Romans are thus accusing Jesus of something that as a faithful Jew he never said: Like Antiochus IV Epiphanes, they had in mind to Hellenize the true religion. The gospel was Hellenized by the Romans, like the face of Zeus, so they tell us with the images that it was the face of Jesus; and the doctrine of the Greek Cleobulus of Lindos is the one that says: "Love your enemy", but they tell us that Jesus taught it: And that is a lie. Antiochus IV Epiphanes tortured eight Jews, seven brothers and his mother because they refused to eat pork because God forbids it (Leviticus 11, 2 Maccabees 7). The prophecy in Isaiah 65 confirms two things: 1 # God loves his friends and hates his enemies. 2# The consumption of pork is confirmed prohibited. Antiochus, the Greek king: "Would you like to eat pork so they won't cut your body to pieces? (2 Maccabees 7:7)." Zeus, the Greek god: "Nothing that I God did is bad if you receive it by praying to me, are they going to refuse to eat pork?,  worship me all, those who don't, go to eternal fire (1 Timothy 4:3 , Hebrews 1:6, Luke 11:28, Matthew 18:7)." The phrase: "Do good to your friends and enemies, because in this way you will preserve the ones and it will be possible for you to attract the others." It is from Cleobulus of Lindos, "love your enemy is another way of saying the same thing", but that contradicts the law and the prophets, Jesus respected the word of God, but the Roman persecutors did not.

 

 

 

 

 

 

With these words: Galatians 1:6-8 But if even we, or an angel from heaven, announce to you another gospel different from the one we have announced to you, be anathema. Saint Paul was referring to his Roman persecutors who would later assassinate him by beheading him to destroy the gospel that he preached and announce a different one, one reflected in the Roman Bible, to which they converted so as not to change their invading behavior at all. The successors of these evil invaders preach nonsense about the Roman empire transformed into the empire of false religion:

  

 

 

 

Those imbeciles say that they can do bad deeds but it is enough for them to say that they accept a long-haired man with the appearance of a Greek god, as their only lord and enough savior to be free from God's punishment, in turn, they affirm that if a person does righteous works but does not accept that long-haired man as his only lord and sufficient savior, he is under the wrath of God, which god? That false God must be Lucifer, indignant with those who do not worship him, but The righteous do not adore or accept any creature as sufficient savior, but only the Creator of the Universe Jehovah! Hosea 13:4 They will worship no Savior other than Jehovah.

 

 

 

 

 

I have been a computer programmer, I like logic, in Turbo Pascal I created a program capable of producing basic random algebra formulas, similar to the formula below. In the following document in .DOCX you can download the program code, this is proof that I am not stupid, so the conclusions of my research should be taken seriously. https://ai20me.files.wordpress.com/2023/02/math21-pas-code-of-a-turbo-pascal-program.docx

If t=799.035 and c=t then c=799.035

The main conclusions of my research: The deception of the Roman empire in the Bible vs. the message of the persecuted in the time of Christ. : https://ntiend.me/2023/04/06/the-deception-of-the-roman-empire-in-the-bible-vs-the-message-of-the-persecuted-in-the-time-of-christ-el-engano-del-imperio-romano-en-la-biblia-vs-el-mensaje-de-los-perseguidos-en-los-tiempos-de-cri/

Irony against the typical slanderous and contradictory message of a hypocritical prophet: "If you pray to those men who are dressed as women and have hair like women, or if you pray to their images, then you are worshiping demons, and you are not adoring only the God of Abraham and his nephew Lot; but if you do the same with our sacred images or the long-haired men to whom we pray through these sacred images, you do not sin because we say that they are the seven archangels of God and their images, to whom we pray so that they intercede for us before God because they are the eyes and ears of God, if we do not pray to God through them or through our sacred statues, God will not know what we say in our prayers because God has sensory limitations." Do those stupid believe that God has intellectual and sensory limitations, such as not knowing in advance what to do against his enemies (Nahum 1:2-14)? Will those priests say (They do not seek a wife for themselves, that is why they have more in common with the Sodomites than with Abraham or Lot; they do not seek God's blessing: Proverbs 19:14, so they chose celibacy excusing themselves on the basis of Roman lies in their Bible), that two of the holy angels were disguised as women, and that for that reason the men of Sodom (who did things that God hates (Genesis 19:1-38, Ezekiel 16:20, Deuteronomy 22:5)) wanted to have sex with them, and not just with those loyal messengers of God (these messengers were male beings like men with the appearance of men and male clothes, fathers of famous heroes (the demi-gods who faced evil giants - Genesis 6:1-4), not asexual beings like jellyfish , not hermaphroditic beings like snails, not female beings like women, but men who were not rebellious, but loyal to God's laws (Daniel 3:25, Daniel 9:21, Psalms 86:2, Deuteronomy 22:5, Psalms 18:25-30, Genesis 2:24, Genesis 3:22-24)), but also with the man, in whom God was pleased, and who therefore was a man who did not dress as a woman, but that despite this, he was the object of sexual desire by abominable men? https://penademuerteya.com/2023/08/07/the-interpretation-of-the-parable-of-the-net-thrown-into-the-sea-to-catch-fish-matthew-1347-the-parable-of-the-net-denies-the-doctrine-of-love-for-the-enemy/